Cases 31 - 40 of 8,690
Schneider v. Morgan et al
as 1:2024cv02415
Defendant:
William Bohrer, Case Management Transfer Coordinatior MCTC, David Igbeara and others
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. West et al
as 7:2024cv00545
Defendant:
Tonya Chapman and Patricia West
Plaintiff:
Oadis William White, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amar v. PSIMED Corrections, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00425
Defendant:
John/Jane Does, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., PSIMED Corrections, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Amar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buruca v. Antelo et al
as 3:2024cv00751
Defendant:
Prince William County, L. Claiborne, Kyle Randall and others
Plaintiff:
Fredy Mauricio Buruca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. FLINT et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Defendant:
CPT RODRIGUEZ, CPT WILLIAM FLINT, OFFICER M. SHEFFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT THEODORE RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Anthony Williams v. Alonzo Thompson
as 24-6769
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GBI, Georgia Bureau Investigation, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS OF SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES PHONE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00737
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lavon M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RAMOS v. FLINT
as 1:2024cv00700
Defendant:
WILLIAM FLINT
Plaintiff:
VINCENT THEODORE RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Williams
as 5:2024ct03190
Plaintiff:
Isaiah J. Bennett
Defendant:
Mr. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osha Johnson v. Marquita McCullough
as 24-6757
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCKISSACK, WARDEN JACKSON, LIEUTENANT ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
OSHA A. JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
