Cases 31 - 40 of 315
Bivens v. Lt. Borum et al
as 9:2022cv04393
Plaintiff:
Quatavious Bernard Bivens
Defendant:
Lt. Borum, Sgt. Freeman, Bryan Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ellis v. Warden of Central Prison et al
as 5:2022ct03425
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ellis
Defendant:
Warden of Central Prison, Ramel Freeman and Donnie R. Raynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
William C. Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Freeman v. Arnold et al
as 9:2022cv03249
Petitioner:
Fred Freeman
Respondent:
Kelly B. Arnold, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Deborah S. McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Paris Funderburk v. Johnson
as 22-7141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PARIS LAQUISHA FUNDERBURK
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY JOHNSON, DEPUTY N. VINSON, DEPUTY WILLIAM BALLEW and others
Watson v. Freeman
as 8:2022cv03646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Watson
Defendant:
Saretha Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
FREEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00868
Petitioner:
LORI STOIN FREEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gibson v. Oconee County Sheriffs Office et al
as 8:2022cv03158
Plaintiff:
Chad Austin Gibson
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriffs Office, School District of Oconee County, Jesus De Luna Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Freeman et al
as 7:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Leon Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
A. Freeman, J. Shephard, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbett v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03308
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Venetia S. Outlaw, Mr. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
