Cases 41 - 50 of 2,340
PORTER v. YATES et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
ANTWAIN PORTER
Defendant:
YATES, ALFRED ALONZO SCOTT, JR., HARGROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Leslie v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6160
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LESLIE
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and DANIEL P. O'BRIEN, Special Deputy Attorney General
Carlton v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
David L. Carlton
Defendant:
Shane Weber, Bradley Butler, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Louis v. Stirling
as 1:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith Louis, Jr. and Saddiq
Defendant:
Brian P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Shawn P. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, R. Langford and Joshua Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepard v. Stirling
as 4:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Ricky James Shepard and Rickey James Shepard
Respondent:
Bryan P. Stirling and Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Booth et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
Booth, Wesley Townsend and P. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Tiller
as 7:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Gerald Wayne Hubbard
Respondent:
Craig P. Tiller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
