Cases 41 - 50 of 4,893
Dugan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Jeremy Dugan
Respondent:
United States of America and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LOTHARP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Correctional Officer M. Slaughter and Medical R.N. W. Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Jamel T. Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juan Arvizu-Hernandez v. Warden Ray
as 24-6155
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN RAY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00431
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCall v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02041
Petitioner:
Dashawn Jewelin McCall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lee v. City of Baltimore et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Christopher Briggs Lee
Defendant:
City of Baltimore, State of Maryland and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
