Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, VA D.O.C. Director, RANDALL C. MATHENA, VA D.O.C. Security Operations Manager, H. SCOTT RICHESON, Deputy Dir., VA D.O.C. and others
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Sumter County Sheriff's Office Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv03457
Plaintiff:
Gregory Vaughn
Defendant:
Sumter County Sheriff's Office Detention Center, Captain Wheeler Sweat, III, Anthony Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tori Bumpers v. US
as 23-6288
Petitioner / Appellant:
TORI DEMARCO BUMPERS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BUMPERS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
TORI DEMARCO BUMPERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tori Neal v. State of North Carolina
as 22-7192
Petitioner / Appellant:
TORI NEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and ERIK A. HOOKS
Staton v. Arcer et al
as 8:2022cv02545
Plaintiff:
Tori Staton
Defendant:
Andrew Arcer and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
NEAL v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2021cv00247
Petitioner:
TORI NEAL
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
