Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Pryor v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jerome Pryor
Defendant:
City of Charleston, Detective W. McCabe, Cory Jarett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staples, Bey v. Childress et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
H. Childress, Matt Hill, Officer Daber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Childress v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2021cv02843
Plaintiff:
Tessa R.R.G.C. Childress
Defendant:
City of North Charleston, Charleston County Sheriff, John O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childress v. Howard
as 5:2021hc02121
Petitioner:
Orlando Rashaud Childress
Respondent:
Malcom J. Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Milliron v. Brown et al
as 1:2020cv00075
Defendant:
Mr. G. Harris, Dr. Gillespie, Mrs. Childress and others
Plaintiff:
William B. Milliron, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Childress v. Regional Jail Authority
as 2:2019cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Childress
Defendant:
Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tessa Childress v. City of Charleston Police Dept
as 17-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TESSA R R G C CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress, filed as Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, LIEUTENANT CHITO T. WALKER, OFFICER SANDERS and others
TURRENTINE v. LOPEZ et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LEVON TURRENTINE
Defendant:
LOPEZ, K. GREEN, T. D. DOUGLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
