Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cauz v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Javier Capote Cauz
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement and M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cauz v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Javier Capote Cauz
Respondent:
M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meister v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2020ct03295
Defendant:
Warden D. Smith, C/M M. Swanagin, AM McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Meister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Parks et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Chauncey A. Williams
Defendant:
J. E. Parks, M. L. Taylor, D. B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2012cv01454
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
M M Mitchell, L. Rosario and R. Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6899
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Party-in-Interest:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maldonado v. Fulwood et al
as 3:2011cv00878
Petitioner:
Alfredo Maldonado
Respondent:
Issac Fulwood and M M Mitchel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
