Cases 1 - 10 of 167
SEWELL v. BOP
as 1:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIC SEWELL
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02096
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
DARYL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Gillens v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6227
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, DOE #1, unknown mail staff/supervisor, KENNETH CRADDOCK, Discipline Hearing Officer and others
Lee v. The BOP - DSCC
as 5:2023cv05503
Plaintiff:
Mario Anton Lee
Defendant:
The BOP - DSCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Ortiz-Vargas v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00306
Petitioner:
Efrain Ortiz-Vargas
Respondent:
Warden Brown and Director of BOP C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roberts v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Timothy Munro Roberts
Defendant:
USA, BOP Director Collette Peters, Yankton FPC, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Demenia Hawkins v. BOP
as 5:2023cv00260
Petitioner:
Demenia Hawkins
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Reed v. Michael, et al.
as 23-6656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL, a/k/a Mike, U.S. Marshal, PHILLIP CORNELIOUS, D.C. Superior Court Agent, JEQUAN JACKSON, U.S. Parole Case Analyst and others
Sloan v. BOP of Allenwood
as 7:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Claude Sloan
Defendant:
BOP of Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
