Cases 1 - 10 of 3,623
Paxton v. Shirkey
as 7:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jonardo Paxton
Defendant:
Hyatt Browning Shirkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv03429
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, Sherisse Birch and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson-Brown v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
LaTonya Richardson-Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Quinton Levar Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bush v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bush
Defendant:
Anthony Brown and St. Mary's County State's Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Craig Johnson and Sgt. E.C. Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Stephen et al
as 8:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Milton Williams
Defendant:
Bryson Stephen, Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, Monise A. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Reza v. United States of America - FBOP et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America - FBOP and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Mecklenburg County Sheriffs et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Tony Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Sheriffs, FNU Stafford, FNU Fennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
