Cases 1 - 10 of 3,605
Reza v. United States of America - FBOP et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America - FBOP and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Brown
Defendant:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6499
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, Laurens County Jail, KIM LITTLE, Mental Health Laurens County Jail and others
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, Ndze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Wright et al.
as 9:2024cv03114
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Honorable Alan Wilson, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos-Bey et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Petitioner:
Erick Santos-Bey and Lawrence H. Morgan
Respondent:
Anthony Brown and Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. NOYES EDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Defendant:
OFFICER #1 J.P. NOYES EDGE and OFFICER #2 T.H. REECE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown-El v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
Tina Brown-El
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
