Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Coleman v. Staunton Police Department
as 7:2022cv00255
Plaintiff: David Scott Coleman
Defendant: Staunton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Albers v. Warden Adams
as 22-6279
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID SCOTT ALBERS
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN ADAMS
Albers v. Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00124
Petitioner: David Scott Albers
Respondent: Warden Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Albers v. Adams et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Petitioner: David Scott Albers
Respondent: P. Adams, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WOODALL v. USA
as 1:2020cv00477
Petitioner: DAVID SCOTT WOODALL
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mooney v. Kershaw C.I. Medical Staff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03319
Defendant: Associate Warden Cannon, Associate Warden Ford, Nurse Lee and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Marshall et al
as 8:2018cv02461
Defendant: Judge John Marshall, Dept of Public Safety VA, Shannon Taylor and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Trammell et al
as 8:2018cv02429
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Henrico County Chief Police, Officer D. Trammell and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Martin Cetron et al
as 8:2018cv02400
Defendant: US Marshalls-SD, Avera McKinron, Columbia Corrective Care and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Cohen et al
as 8:2018cv02260
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Defendant: Judge Alexander and Suzanne Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?