Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Collins v. The McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
John Mark Collins, II and Mattie Collins McGuire
Defendant:
The McDowell County Commission, Tina Blackburn, Barbara Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James-Bey v. N.C. Dept. of Public Safety et al
as 1:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, FNU Reynolds, J. Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James-Bey
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
Damien G. Bey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Maynard et al
as 1:2013cv01639
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Collins
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Jon Galley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryidu-X v. Stouffer
as 1:2013cv01398
Plaintiff:
Ryidu-X M. Malcom
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, John Wolfe, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Lay v. James Clinton
as 11-6404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. LAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. CLINTON, ARTHUR M. WALLENSTEIN, J. L. JONES and others
Defendant:
ISIAH LEGGETT
Shannon v. McKie et al
as 6:2011cv00519
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shannon
Defendant:
Bernard McKie , Joyner , Major Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Lay v. James Clinton
as 09-7065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. LAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. CLINTON, ARTHUR M. WALLENSTEIN, J. L. JONES and others
Defendant:
ISIAH LEGGETT
John Lay v. Clinton etal
as 09-6702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. LAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. CLINTON, J. L. JONES, JOHN DOE, (One) and others
Defendant:
ISIAH LEGGETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
