Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Jamar Holt v. Fred Entzel
as 22-7380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR HOLT
Defendant / Appellee:
FRED ENTZEL, Warden, in his personal and official capacity, ERIC HOWELL, Captain, in his personal and official capacity, ACTING WARDEN KEYES, in his personal and official capacity and others
Kelley v. Lexington County et al
as 0:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Rodney Shelton Kelley
Defendant:
Lexington County, Lexington County Detention Center, Lt. Felder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Westmoreland v. Lexington County et al
as 9:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
David Brian Westmoreland
Defendant:
Lexington County, Lexington County Detention Center, Lexington County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isbell v. Warden, R. Keyes
as 1:2020cv00260
Respondent:
Warden, R. Keyes
Petitioner:
Israel Carl Isbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keyes v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv00690
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Petitioner:
Ivory Lavar Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks-Davis v. Adams et al
as 3:2020cv00149
Petitioner:
Lennora R. Banks-Davis
Respondent:
P. Adams, William P. Barr, B. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks-Davis v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00139
Respondent:
Warden R. McCaffrey, Warden B. Antonelli, Warden P. Adams and others
Petitioner:
Lennora R. Banks-Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks-Davis v. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv00521
Respondent:
Warden R. McCaffrey, Warden B. Antonelli, Warden P. Adams and others
Petitioner:
Lennora R. Banks-Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bone v. Whetstone et al
as 5:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Ofc. Fabery, Lt. Whetstone, Ofc. Kitchen and others
Plaintiff:
Lavell Bone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bone v. Whetstone et al
as 3:2019cv00215
Defendant:
Associate Warden Keyes, Ofc. Fabery, Lt. Whetstone and others
Plaintiff:
Lavell Bone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
