Cases 1 - 10 of 1,722
Rivers v. Town of Mooresville et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Rivers
Defendant:
Town of Mooresville, J.E. Glenn, FNU Goodale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Warden of Tyger River
as 9:2024cv03653
Petitioner:
Kevin Charles Casey
Respondent:
Warden of Tyger River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollins v. FBOP et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Kevin Dale Hollins
Respondent:
FBOP, Mr. Suero, J. Siclari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Charles County Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01782
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morgan
Defendant:
Charles County Det. Center and CO2 D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Kevin Bullock
as 24-6593
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN ELWOOD BULLOCK, a/k/a Half
Bolton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv02645
Plaintiff:
Thurston M. Bolton
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Nurse Supervisor, Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Watson v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Watson
Defendant:
M. Hamilton, K.D. Ramey, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Holtzinger v. Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Joshua T. Murphy
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Kevin Punturi, Jermiah Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
