Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bell v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Jaylen Dalaino Bell
Respondent:
United States and Jackson County of Ripley, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFF SESSIONS, RIPLEY RAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ripley v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
David John Ripley
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Lt. London et al
as 1:2020cv03039
Defendant:
Dr. Polynskee, Lt. V. Jones, Lt. Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Marquise Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LANGSTON v. UICKER et al
as 1:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PHILLIP LANGSTON
Defendant:
KRISTEN J. UICKER, RIPLEY RAND and KYLE D. POUSSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ripley v. Booker
as 1:2016cv01569
Petitioner:
Julius Ripley
Respondent:
Bernard Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anthony Dove v. Imelda Pate
as 16-6223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL L. JONES, Resident Superior Court Judge - Lenoir County, RIPLEY EAGLES RAND, U.S. Attorney - Middle District of N.C., IMELDA JEAN PATE, Assistant District Attorney - Lenoir County and others
ARNOLD v. ELAISON et al
as 1:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
RUSSELL A. ELAISON, JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dove v. Pate et al
as 5:2015ct03132
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dove
Defendant:
Imelda J. Pate, Paul L. Jones, Ripley E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ripley v. Wester
as 5:2014ct03275
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ripley
Defendant:
Mrs. Wester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
