Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,167
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff: Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant: Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner: Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner: Roger Lee Smith
Respondent: Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff: DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant: SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff: KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant: JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Lynch v. USA
as 7:2024cv01219
Petitioner: Roger Earl Lynch
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Monzon v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff: Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant: L Rogers, Shenica Royster, Erick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: William Parke Custis
Defendant: Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff: IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant: T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. USA
as 3:2024cv00181
Petitioner: Mario Reginald Rogers
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?