Cases 1 - 10 of 4,337
Watson v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Marvin M. Watson
Defendant:
Warden, Travis Guess and S. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Exec. Dir. F. Todd Taylor, Jr, Dept. Dir. Robin Woolford, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner:
DAVON TATE
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Gause v. Covington et al
as 5:2024ct03143
Plaintiff:
Walter Timothy Gause
Defendant:
Captain Ronald Covington, Unit Manager Nealey, S Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. The State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv03303
Plaintiff:
Devin Rashad Johnson
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina, Jeremiah S. Freeman and Robert L. Stuckes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
Mr. S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
