Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Anderson v. Walls et al
as 7:2024cv00569
Defendant:
Walls and P. Thomas
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Walls et al
as 1:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Defendant:
Walls and P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLS v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Defendant:
OFC. WALKER, OFC. TYLER, OFC. HOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE F. WALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Smallwood et al
as 5:2024ct03181
Plaintiff:
Mark Wall
Defendant:
C/O Parker and SRG Smallwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety - DPS
as 24-6605
Defendant:
CONNIE LOCKLEAR JONES, Doctor, PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR, Grievance Processer, CYNTHIA LOWERY, Green Unit Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Matthew Budney v. Julie Springer
as 24-6529
Defendant:
CAPTAIN LAWSON, Laurens County Dentention Center, NURSE GRANT, Laurens County Dentention Center, LIEUTENANT HUMPHRIES, Laurens County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
WALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
RODNEY EDWARD WALL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Matthew Budney v. Julie Springer
as 24-6499
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MADDOX, Laurens County Detention Center, LIEUTENANT MILLER, Laurens County Detention Center, OFFICER BROWN, Laurens County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Boggs v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dustin Boggs and Luke Tyler Holstein
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
