Cases 91 - 100 of 1,376
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02840
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Vilma Mejia-Garcia v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1651
Petitioner:
VILMA MERCEDES MEJIA-GARCIA, B.A.M., OSCAR ROBERTO MEJIA-MEJIA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Evelyn Garcia-Alberto v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1640
Petitioner:
EVELYN ARELY GARCIA-ALBERTO, a/k/a Evelin Arely Garcia-Alberto
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Garcia v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Enrique Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ventura Garcia v. Warden Janson
as 23-6539
Petitioner / Appellant:
VENTURA GARCIA, a/k/a Ventura Garcia Olvera
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JANSON
Garcia v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Segundo Tarquino Guero Garcia and Segundo Tarquino Cuero Garcia
Respondent:
H. L. Ray and Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia v. Richland Co. Treasurer et al
as 3:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
Richland Co. Treasurer and David A. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lobato et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02213
Plaintiff:
Kent Lobato, James Bent, Lawrence Campbell and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
