Cases 91 - 100 of 381
Stevens v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stevens
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adeyola v. Reddy et al
as 5:2022ct03008
Plaintiff:
Umar Adeyola
Defendant:
Dr. Edavally Reddy, Jennifer Adkins, RN Ms. Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Dye et al
as 5:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Eric Dye, FNU LNU, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADEYOLA v. REDDY et al
as 1:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
UMAR ADEYOLA
Defendant:
DR. EDAVALLY REDDY, NP JENNIFER ADKINS, RN BUTTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. City of Huntington et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Rocky Eugene Burgess
Defendant:
City of Huntington, Dakota Dishman, Officer Lawhon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSKEY v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00773
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL H. FOSKEY
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JANET YELLEN, CHARLES P. RETTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ritter v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2021ct03288
Plaintiff:
David Alan Ritter
Defendant:
Lieutenant Bryan K. Wheeler, Officer Kinner and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemens v. Counselorchen, P.C. et al
as 1:2021cv01002
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Clemens
Defendant:
Counselorchen, P.C., Consumer Solution Center, John Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Biggerstaff v. Spencer et al
as 1:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
Nicole Biggerstaff
Defendant:
Angelina Spencer, Greg Christopher, Haywood County, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
