Cases 91 - 100 of 154
McKay v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03807
Plaintiff:
Kara McKay
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and John Doe Corporations and Individuals 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steshenko v. McKay et al
as 1:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Gregory Steshenko
Defendant:
Thomas McKay, Dorothy Nunn, Anne Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Kemp v. Drago et al
as 1:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
Travis Mandell Kemp
Defendant:
Paul C Drago, Cecilia Reynolds, Jeanna McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKay v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv01601
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. McKay
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alvin Mosier v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 12-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN MOSIER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ROBERT MCDONNELL, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, MARIA GRAFF DECKER, in her official capacity as the Virginia Department of Corrections Secretary of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mosier v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2011cv01381
Plaintiff:
Alvin Mosier
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Robert F. McDonnell, Marla Graff Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bing v. McKay et al
as 2:2011cv03174
Plaintiff:
Contrez Leon Bing
Defendant:
Warden McKay, Captain Clark, Lieutenant Will and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cumbie v. Andrews South Carolina, Town of et al
as 2:2011cv02934
Plaintiff:
Dan Rhette Cumbie, Jr
Defendant:
Andrews South Carolina, Town of , Timothy Harrelson , Brian McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
