Cases 101 - 110 of 173
Mitchell v. USA
as 6:2011cv70011
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jason David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wray v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2010cv00298
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Wray, Jr.
Defendant:
R. David Mitchell, Beverly Perdue, Roy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart Tompkins v. David Mitchell
as 10-7502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent at Mountain View Correctional Institution, JOHN DOE BLACK, Mailroom Officer at Mountain View Correctional Institution, PAUL TAYLOR, Assistant Superintendent of Programs at Mountain View Correctional Institution and others
Dollar v. Keller et al
as 5:2010cv00156
Petitioner:
David Lee Dollar
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller
Respondent:
David Mitchell and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tompkins v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
David Mitchell, John Doe Black, Paul Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorehead v. Keller et al
as 1:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jackie Emmitt Moorehead
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Robert C. Lewis and R. David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hershberger et al v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00837
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hershberger and David Mitchell
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. South Carolina, State of
as 2:2010cv01343
Petitioner:
David Mitchell Tucker
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billy Locklear v. Boyd Bennett
as 10-6651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY RAY LOCKLEAR
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD BENNETT, Regional Director, DAVID MITCHELL, Facility Administrator, MIKE SLAGLE, 3rd in Command and others
Buchnowski v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2010mc00057
Petitioner:
James Brian Buchnowski
Respondent:
David Mitchell and Attorney General of North Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
