Cases 101 - 110 of 481
PICKENS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
BRANDON PICKENS
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, KIERAN J. SHANAHAN, GEORGE T. SOLOMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosher v. Municipality of Onslow County et al
as 5:2016ct03024
Plaintiff:
Greggory G. Mosher, Jr.
Defendant:
Municipality of Onslow County, Charles H. Henry, Paul Y.K. Castle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Lewis et al
as 1:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, R. Beddingfield, John S. Carbone and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuler et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15379
Plaintiff:
Connie Schuler and Robert C. Schuler
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Ex Rel. Robert C. Searle v. DRS Technical Servies, Inc.
as 15-2442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. ROBERT C. SEARLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DRS TECHNICAL SERVIES, INC., DRS C3 & AVIATION COMPANY and THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC.
Shaun Hayden v. Paul Butler, Jr.
as 15-7676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHAUN ANTONIO HAYDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL G. BUTLER, JR.
Defendant:
ALVIN KELLER, ROBERT C. LEWIS and ANTHONY E. RAND
Anderson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13908
Plaintiff:
Rita K. Anderson and Robert C. Anderson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Johnson
as 1:2015cv13846
Petitioner:
Robert C. Morris
Respondent:
B.J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stills v. Janney Montgomery Scott LLC et al
as 3:2015cv03699
Plaintiff:
Robert C Stills, Jr
Defendant:
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Amy Stills
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
