Cases 111 - 120 of 357
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pressley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv03407
Defendant:
Durham School Services, L.P., UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Pressley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672
Draper v. United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
as 3:2018cv00070
Defendant:
United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
Plaintiff:
Cedrick E. Draper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Draper v. United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
as 1:2018cv01011
Defendant:
United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
Plaintiff:
Cedrick E Draper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ramos v. United States Postal Service
as 8:2018cv01479
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Ramos
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Alexandria Hess and Jennie Joyce Claypoole
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States of America and Leroy Richard Musgrove, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rooks v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Rooks
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coakley v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2018cv01086
Plaintiff:
Laverne Coakley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
