Cases 11 - 20 of 553
Holmes v. Stone, III et al
as 9:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
George Holmes
Defendant:
Isaac M. Stone, III, Samantha Molina and Jared Shedd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaac Myers v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06474
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Isaac v. USA
as 2:2023cv00643
Petitioner:
Justin Michael Isaac
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Singletary v. Cramer et al
as 2:2023cv06086
Plaintiff:
John Singletary
Defendant:
Isaac Cramer, Keith Rossoen, Thomas James Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 - Voting Rights Act of 1965
Isaac v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Isaac
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Aurel v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
Aurel Mich and Mich Aurel
Defendant:
United States of America, Maryland State Prisoners Officers, C.O. Aliu Olatunji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Pickens et al
as 8:2023cv05593
Petitioner:
Malcolm Bey and Malcolm Rawlinson Bey
Respondent:
Jeremy Pickens, Isaac K Fekete and Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morell v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2023cv05528
Plaintiff:
Isaac Morell
Defendant:
Jason Cunningham, Steven W. Griffith, Barnwell County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Malcolm Bey v. Isaac Fekete
as 23-7047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ISAAC K. FEKETE, d/b/a South Carolina Highway Patrol
Isaacs v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jack Isaacs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
