Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Mayfield v. Bi-Lo LLC
as 6:2022cv04001
Plaintiff:
Debbie A Mayfield
Defendant:
Bi-Lo LLC doing business as Bi-Lo Store # 5016
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Mayfield et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Mayfield and Wilorid Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fitistics, LLC v. Erik Cherdak
as 21-1537
Defendant:
TODD STEWART BALDWIN, EARL N. MAYFIELD, III, Esq. and SEAN MCKIRDY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FITISTICS, LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIK B. CHERDAK
MAYFIELD v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
TIA MAYFIELD
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mayfield v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00901
Plaintiff:
Selestine Mayfield
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fitistics, LLC v. Erik Cherdak
as 20-2070
Defendant:
TODD STEWART BALDWIN, EARL N. MAYFIELD, III, Esq. and SEAN MCKIRDY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FITISTICS, LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIK B. CHERDAK
Lucolia Mayfield v. Harold Clarke
as 20-7493
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUCOLIA MAYFIELD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Mayfield v. Young et al
as 5:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Other Medical Personels Unknown, Nurse Mr. Rose, Warden Young and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Mayfield et al
as 3:2020cv00049
Defendant:
B. Mayfield, V. M. Washington, C. Putney and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon J. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
