Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Romero-Sanchez v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04702
Plaintiff:
Maria Sara Romero-Sanchez
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. and Reddy Ice, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Property Damage (P.I.)
Fischer et al v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Fischer and Wayne Fischer
Defendant:
Rubie Martin, 7-Eleven, Inc., Rommel Infrastructure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mason v. 7 Eleven, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01559
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Mason
Defendant:
7 Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
Miriam Smith
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., Vixxo, Inc. and Conserv Building Services of North Carolina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cooper v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Trinta Cooper and Trinita Cooper
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. and doing business as 7-Eleven and Megan Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joyner v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00279
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andre Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
7-Eleven, Inc. v. 7 Seven Store & Grocery, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01269
Plaintiff:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Defendant:
Nehemias O. Salvador and 7 Seven Store & Grocery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Brian Davis v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 19-1256
Defendant / Appellee:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN L. DAVIS
Martin Rugamba v. MTA Police Officer 1
as 19-1053
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, MTA BUS DRIVER, DOES 1-20 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MTA POLICE OFFICER 1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN RUGAMBA
Vondrake v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01277
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Lottery Commission, 7-Eleven, Inc., Mavis L. Wanczyk and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Vondrake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
