Cases 11 - 20 of 6,427
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Clark
as 1:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James Robert Nelson
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Cabrales et al
as 1:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Ellis Matthews
Defendant:
Hector E. Cabrales, Dale Clark, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia Dept. of Child Support
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
REGINALD WRIGHT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, VERLITA HARRIS, individually and in her official capacity as an Operations Manager, LAURA MCVAY, individually and in her capacity as a Child Support Attorney and others
Clark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kristine Clark
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hare v. Upper Marlboro Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Antoine Javon Hare
Defendant:
Upper Marlboro Detention Center, Terence Clark, Officer H. Stanback and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
