Cases 11 - 20 of 864
Thomas Simpson v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6338
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BARTHOLOMEW SIMPSON
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, ROBERT MOSIER, JASON S. MIYARES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Davis v. Hagy et al
as 7:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Terrance R. Davis
Defendant:
Officer M. Hagy and Tikki Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
McKiernan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Roger Alexander Hicks and Timothy McKiernan
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Charles Hicks v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01446
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Staton et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
J'on Staton and Cree Faulkner
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, Christopher Hicks, Nicholas Kirkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Londell Alston v. John Hicks
as 24-6190
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant:
JOHN HICKS, Chief, RODNEY HOPE, Sergeant, Chief and COUNTY OF YORK
US v. Willie Hicks
as 24-4125
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIE LAMONT HICKS, a/k/a Will Woodward, a/k/a CW
Hicks v. Capital One Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Clarence Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, Encore Capital Group, Inc. and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
