Cases 11 - 20 of 553
Wright v. Ray et al
as 2:2023cv05913
Plaintiff:
Travis J Wright
Defendant:
S.L.R.D.C. Director Ray, Captain Sweat, Lt Gaymon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erwin v. Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Monique Latrice Erwin
Defendant:
Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services, Angela C. Karchmer, Tereasa L. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv04821
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Investigator Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Bowman v. River North Prison
as 7:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bowman
Defendant:
River North Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Keen Mountain
as 7:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bowman
Defendant:
Keen Mountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Bradburn et al
as 7:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Banks
Defendant:
CO Bradburn, CO Smallwood, CO Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv03324
Petitioner:
Ricky Bowman and Ricky Sherod Bowman
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Bowman
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rusty Ryan Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Cecil, Jr. v. John Bowman
as 23-6654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE CECIL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BOWMAN and KEVIN JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
