Cases 11 - 20 of 523
Murphy v. Falls et al
as 1:2024cv01129
Defendant:
William Rohwer, Jeremy A. Falls, Sean Healy and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ryan Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. New Hanover County North Carolina
as 24-6603
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR D. H. PRICE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSHUA STEIN, North Carolina Attorney General and others
Stewart v. Bishop
as 0:2024cv03606
Defendant:
Manday Bishop
Plaintiff:
Ben Robert Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodney Cobbs v. Ben David
as 24-6571
Defendant:
BEN DAVID and CONNIE JORDAN
Plaintiff:
RODNEY E. COBBS
Dexter Bennings v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv03480
Defendant:
Chemicals Inc, Carrier Global Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Bennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Robert Aaron Dowell, Vernon Edwards, Ronald Farmer and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Zachary Hebb v. City of Asheville, North Carolina
as 24-1383
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY HERB and ZACHARY HEBB
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA and BEN WOODY, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Development Services Department for City of Asheville, North Carolina
Su v. Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
