Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Frankie LordMaster v. E. Barksdale
as 16-6869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, f/k/a Jason Robert Goldader
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BARKSDALE, Warden; Red Onion, UNKNOWN MEMBER, Red Onion's Goon Squad, MUNICIPAL (LIABILITY) OF POUND and others
King-El v. Meadows
as 5:2016ct03047
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. King-El
Defendant:
Lonnie Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Ball v. Jeffrey Artrip
as 14-7659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD KEITH BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY ARTRIP, G. K. WASHINGTON, ASST. WARDEN WALWRATH and others
King v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv21032
Plaintiff:
Vickie D. King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Personal Property Seized From Ryon D. King et al
as 5:2014cv00225
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Personal Property Seized From Ryon D. King, $9,394.00 in U. S. Currency and A 2004 BMW 745Li
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
King v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Shirley D King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv05764
Plaintiff:
April D. King and Joseph D. King
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00836
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Sheryl D. King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. King et al
as 4:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Richard D King and GCB of SC LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
