Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Wood et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21209
Plaintiff:
Kathy K. Wood and Christopher D. Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall-Woods et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv22597
Plaintiff:
Joyce Marshall-Woods and Michael D. Woods
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv20515
Plaintiff:
Shelia D. Woods and Charles Woods
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wood et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv06895
Plaintiff:
Myra J. Wood and Eddie D. Wood
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Federal Trade Commission v. IAB Marketing Associates, LP et al
as 2:2012mc00022
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
IAB Marketing Associates, LP, Independent Association of Businesses, Healthcorp International, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Charlene C. Koonce
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. IAB MARKETING ASSOCIATES, LP et al
as 1:2012mc00059
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
IAB MARKETING ASSOCIATES, LP, INDEPENDENT ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES, HEALTHCORP INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Federal Trade Commission v. IAB Marketing Associates, LP et al
as 7:2012mc00074
Defendant:
FAV Marketing, Inc., Judy M. Hamilton, Roy D. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Woods v. Aramark Corporation
as 1:2012cv00939
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Woods
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 1:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Woods
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Cotter et al
as 5:2011cv00588
Plaintiff:
Edward D Mack
Defendant:
Daniel Cotter , Michael McCall , Miriam Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
