Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Silvers v. Iredell County Department of Social Services et al
as 5:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Silvers, Sr.
Defendant:
Iredell County Department of Social Services, Donald C. Wall , Paxton Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gregg-Wilson v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarbor
as 15-1699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GREGG-WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, SUE ERWIN HARPER, FOLEY & LARDNER and others
McGrail v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv24729
Plaintiff:
David Thomas McGrail
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24385
Plaintiff:
Karen Thomas and David Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20016
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Martin and David Thomas Martin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06735
Plaintiff:
Nadean Thomas and David Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv03023
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. Thomas and David Thomas
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26066
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Thomas and David Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. SHANAHAN
as 1:2013cv00427
Petitioner:
DAVID THOMAS
Respondent:
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowie et al v. Sandy Excavating, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Bowie and Robert Borrell
Defendant:
Sandy Excavating, Inc. and William T. Sandy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
