Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ray v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Ray
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Belay Reddick v. Pamela Justice
as 15-6084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BELAY REDDICK
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA JUSTICE, MARY M. MITCHELL, J. HOLLETT and others
Ray et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv24928
Plaintiff:
Maria Ray and James E. Ray
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Ray v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Ray
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Michael Kennedy v. Eastern Shore Psychological
as 10-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
EASTERN SHORE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, KATHRYN SEIFERT, KAREN E. RAY and others
Equity in Athletics, Incorpora v. Department of Education
as 10-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EQUITY IN ATHLETICS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MARGARET SPELLINGS, Secretary of Education, in her official and individual capacity, STEPHANIE MONROE JOHNSON, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, in her official and individual capacity and others
Michael Kennedy v. Eastern Shore Psychological Se
as 09-1746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
EASTERN SHORE PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, KATHRYN SEIFERT, KAREN E. RAY and others
Kennedy v. Eastern Shore Psychological Services et al
as 1:2009cv01549
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Kennedy
Defendant:
Eastern Shore Psychological Services, Kathryn M. Seifert, Karen E. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ray v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Ray
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
