Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Turner v. Howell et al
as 4:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hines Turner
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Howell, Ashlee Dalton, Robert L. Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Furr v. Chief of Selma Police Department et al
as 5:2022ct03455
Plaintiff:
Julian Terell Furr
Defendant:
Chief of Selma Police Department, Thomas Lock, Director of NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Armstrong v. Byrd et al
as 6:2022cv04208
Plaintiff:
Jerome Armstrong
Defendant:
Brandon Byrd, Vanessa Mitchell, Candice Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Easley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sandy Easley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Fordham v. Easley et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
George Fordham
Defendant:
Ryan Easley and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Easley v. Cofield
as 8:2021cv01196
Plaintiff:
Brian G. Easley
Defendant:
Dr. Keenan Cofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2021cv00241
Defendant:
Cary Police, Pat McCrory, State of North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
