Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Irwin Lipton v. A. McLean, III
as 17-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRWIN J. LIPTON, Derivatively on Behalf of World Acceptance Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
A. ALEXANDER MCLEAN, III, JOHN L. CALMES, JR., KELLY M. MALSON and others
ROBINSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00133
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOSHUA ROLLINS , A.M. GOINS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONY JAMES ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. David Henderson
as 16-4597
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID HENDERSON, a/k/a Charldrick James Robinson
Robinson v. Ed Robinson Laundry and Dry Cleaning Inc
as 3:2015cv02882
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Ed Robinson Laundry and Dry Cleaning Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robinson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30597
Plaintiff:
Kelly Robinson and James Robinson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elders et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv16263
Plaintiff:
Marian Elders and James Robinson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Robinson v. Karen Fryar
as 13-6992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN NEWELL FRYAR, Solicitor, VANESSA COOPER, Solicitor, WARREN GIESE, Solicitor and others
Robinson v. Fryar et al
as 3:2012cv03505
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Karen Fryar, Vanessa Cooper, Warren Giese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbitt v. Branton et al
as 1:2012cv02967
Plaintiff:
Nolan Corbitt
Defendant:
Alice Branton, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Rhonda Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Cannon et al
as 4:2012cv00155
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Respondent:
Al Cannon, Mitch Lucas and Scarlet Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
