Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,627
US v. Kevin Jones
as 24-4249
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KEVIN RONREGUS JONES, a/k/a Suffolk Ron
US v. Arlington County, Virginia
as 24-1412
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FIBERLIGHT, LLC, 8.929 ACRES OF LAND IN ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA and others
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff: KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant: GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Coates v. Lt. Keistler et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff: Alkein Coates
Defendant: Lt. Keistler, Tyler, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 24-1408
Plaintiff: GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant: ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
David McLester v. Lindsey DeGuehery
as 24-6446
Plaintiff: DAVID MARTIN MCLESTER
Defendant: DR. LINDSEY DEGUEHERY and NURSE R. JONES
Souder v. ADT Solar LLC
as 3:2024cv02883
Defendant: ADT Solar LLC formerly known as Mark Jones Construction, LLC d/b/a Sunpro Solar Successor in Interest Mark Jones Construction, LLC d/b/a Sunpro Solar and Mark Jones Construction, LLC d
Plaintiff: James Souder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01333
Plaintiff: Donald Jones
Defendant: Queen Anne's County, Maryland, Warden/Director Lamonte Cooke, Sgt. Daniel Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Jones v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner: Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent: Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Ryan Jones
as 24-4241
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RYAN JONES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?