Cases 11 - 20 of 11,915
Blount v. USA
as 3:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Lee Blount
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ward v. West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lee Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) and Attorney Joseph Brophy Cordell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, FNU Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Thomas v. Mr. Smith
as 24-6434
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE THOMAS
Defendant:
MR. SMITH, Blue Unit Manager, MR. AURTHER, Asst. Blue Unit Manager and SGT. SHIRLEY, Blue Unit
Jordan v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 3:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Lee County Sheriff's Office, John E. Slaten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baskerville v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Baskerville
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gary Jones v. Darrell Moore
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
GARY JONES
Defendant:
DARRELL MOORE, PAMELA LEE, MS. ALANA, (BCOPO) Chief's Secretary and others
Robert Foster v. Bryan Stirling
as 24-6414
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Defendant:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, MEDICAL BRANCH and LARRY POWELL, Director of Spartanburg County Jail
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Boyd
as 7:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gilford A. Lee
Defendant:
Randy Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
