Cases 11 - 20 of 106
M. et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
M. M. and Jency McClain
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cauz v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Javier Capote Cauz
Respondent:
M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Abrasive Blasting and Coating, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund and Terry L Nelson
Defendant:
Abrasive Blasting and Coating, LLC, M&M Acquisition Corp. and Marcus Fuller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Meister v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2020ct03295
Defendant:
Warden D. Smith, C/M M. Swanagin, AM McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Meister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ICENY USA, LLC v. M&M's, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv02418
Defendant:
Marvin Castro Mondragon, Gabriel Eugene Pico, M&M's LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ICENY USA LLC and ICENY USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
