Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Davis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2020cv03527
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
WMATA, Amit Tonse, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jason Shafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Culpepper v. Watts Regulator Co. et al
as 7:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Watts Regulator Co. a/k/a, d/b/a, Mueller Steam Specialty Co., Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Watts Regulator Co. a/k/a d/b/a Mueller Steam Specialty Co.
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis Culpepper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Doe et al
as 4:2020cv02021
Plaintiff:
Larry Michael Davis
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. CCRx of North Carolina, LLC
as 3:2019cv00604
Defendant:
CCRx of North Carolina, LLC
Plaintiff:
Garry Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TPLS Christian Academy et al v. DD Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01668
Plaintiff:
TPLS Christian Academy , Danny J. Pack, Jr. and Michael Davis
Defendant:
DD Enterprises, Inc. and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018hc02143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241
LEAK v. MOYER et al
as 1:2016cv01442
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY LEAK
Defendant:
MOYER, MENDOZA and MICHAEL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAK v. MOYER et al
as 1:2016cv01359
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY LEAK
Defendant:
MOYER, MICHAEL DAVIS and MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SELLERS v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
KELVIN LEANDER SELLERS
Defendant:
GEORGE SOLOMON and MICHAEL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerard Morrison v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 14-2308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY CRAWFORD, BRADFORD COCHRANE, JR., ROBERT LISON and others
Plaintiff:
GARY DIZE
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VA
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
