Cases 11 - 20 of 4,189
Balfour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Craig Balfour
Defendant:
David Miller and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Al-Haqq v. Mims et al
as 2:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Mr Mims, Ms. Butler, Staci Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6499
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, Laurens County Jail, KIM LITTLE, Mental Health Laurens County Jail and others
Miller v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Samuel Scott Miller and Samuel Miller
Defendant:
Communications Resource, Inc. Wrap Benefit Plan and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Prince George's County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Johnte' Dorsey
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Dept., Detective Windsor, Detective Ann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
