Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Neely v. North Myrtle Beach South Carolina, City of et al
as 4:2017cv02597
Plaintiff:
James E Neely
Defendant:
North Myrtle Beach South Carolina, City of , North Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of and Bobbie R Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Antonio Hall
as 17-6312
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO R. HALL, a/k/a Mack
Hall v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
John R. Hall
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracey Grady v. Lisa Hall
as 16-7061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA R. HALL, ALJ Judge, Disability Hearing Law Judge Office of the Disability Adjudication and Review, Raleigh, NC, MICHAEL SHARPE, Dr., Pitt Memorial Hospital Staff, JULIE SAWYER LITTLE, Vocational Expert and others
Grady v. Hall et al
as 5:2016ct03026
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Lisa R. Hall, Michael Sharpe, Julie Sawyer Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim Griffin v. Willard Hall
as 15-6679
Petitioner - Appellant:
KIM ANTONIO GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLARD R. HALL
James Hayes v. Tracy Phillip
as 15-6078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES AARON HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY PHILLIPS, GLORIA THORNBURG and WILLARD R. HALL
Defendant:
AGUSTAS HILYARD, THOMAS ASBELL, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Hall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
James R. Hall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Firemen's Insurance Company of Washington, D.C. v. Hall et al
as 1:2014cv02045
Plaintiff:
Firemen's Insurance Company of Washington, D.C.
Defendant:
John R. Hall and Jane L. Sheret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
