Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Mullins v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2018cv00514
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Mullins
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC
as 17-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT, MATTHEW ABEDI, MONICA ADAIR SARGENT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEXANDRIA HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S LEESBURG HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S MANASSAS HYUNDAI, LLC and others
Daniels et al v. The Carter-Jones Lumber Company et al
as 1:2017cv00982
Plaintiff:
Clara Daniels and Robert Daniels
Defendant:
The Carter-Jones Lumber Company, E3 Holdings, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv19764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Destin et al v. Commander In Chief et al
as 3:2014cv00441
Plaintiff:
Fedelina Roybal-De-Aguero, Charisse Marquette Destin, ETS-VA and others
Defendant:
Boleman Law LLC, Chesterfield County Circuit Court, Chesterfield County Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Mayfield et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv13363
Plaintiff:
Jackie Mayfield and Robert Daniel Mayfield
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burke et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05094
Plaintiff:
Barbara Burke and Robert Daniel Burke
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Osborne v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Osborne, II
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
