Cases 11 - 20 of 12,124
Sayers v. Bateman et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Brooke Ashley Sayers
Defendant:
Lewis Thomas Bateman and Steven M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Shyla Smith
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv03503
Plaintiff:
Devonte Smith
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. USA
as 5:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Nashiem Malik Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMAS v. SMITH
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO TREMAINE THOMAS
Defendant:
SERGEANT SMITH, MR. PETRELLI, Lt. T. CHAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ann deWet v. G. Rollyson, Jr.
as 24-1534
Plaintiff:
ANN BARCLAY DEWET, and and LAURENCE E.T. SMITH, in their capacities as personal representatives of the Estate of Ann Tierney Smith
Defendant:
G. RUSSELL ROLLYSON, JR., in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
