Cases 11 - 20 of 26
BURCHAM v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
RICHARD STEPHEN BURCHAM
Defendant:
CARLTON JOYNER, TODD PINNION, GEORGE T. SOLOMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Raleigh Wake Citizens Association et al v. Barefoot et al
as 5:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Raleigh Wake Citizens Association , Jannet B. Barnes , Beverley S. Clark and others
Defendant:
Chad Barefoot, Philip E. Berger, Tim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jennifer T Lee and Wayne A Lee
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway
as 14-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 14-1585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS and SECRETARY OF LABOR
Calla Wright v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALLA WRIGHT, WILLIE J. BETHEL, AMY T. LEE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Wright et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Calla Wright , Willie J. Bethel , Amy T. Lee and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Wake County Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00473
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Lee
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
