Cases 21 - 30 of 320
Hoglan v. Robinson et al
as 7:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Hoglan
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, Charley Crumpler, Gordon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Eason v. Raymond Bailey
as 22-6547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES F. EASON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND BAILEY, KIRBY SANDERSON, GEORGE W. BAYSDEN, JR. and others
Akers et al v. County of Sampson
as 7:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Akers, Jessica Byrd, Joseph Byrd and others
Defendant:
County of Sampson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pope et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00647
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Pope and Donna Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Ager, Jerry Antoine, Elizabeth Arflin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. v. Pope et al
as 2:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Cathy L. Pope and Tina M. Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Pope v. Fletcher-Hill, et al.
as 1:2021cv02935
Plaintiff:
Ms. Mayner J. Pope
Defendant:
The Honorable Lawrence P. Fletcher-Hill, Ms Marilyn F. Bentley, Ms Abigale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Stout v. Sgt. Pope
as 1:2021cv01081
Plaintiff:
Marc Stout
Defendant:
Sgt. Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacqueline Humphries v. Oakcrest Towers Apt.
as 21-1882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE R. HUMPHRIES
Defendant / Appellee:
OAKCREST TOWERS APT., Individual and Official Capacity, agent of National Registered Agents, TIM CUTORA, Owner, KAREN DWARYA, Owner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
