Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Bigelow v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv22449
Plaintiff:
Naomi E. Bigelow
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bigelow et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv17441
Plaintiff:
Tina Bigelow and Brett Bigelow
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BIGELOW v. SHANAHAN
as 1:2013cv00490
Petitioner:
MAURICE L. BIGELOW
Respondent:
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BIGELOW v. SHANAHAN
as 1:2013cv00425
Petitioner:
MAURICE L. BIGELOW
Respondent:
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BIGELOW v. YOUNG
as 1:2013cv00377
Petitioner:
MAURICE L. BIGELOW
Respondent:
REUBEN F. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BIGELOW v. ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2012cv01051
Plaintiff:
TARA ELAINE BIGELOW and THOMAS NELSON BIGELOW
Defendant:
ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, BERNARD D. COBLE and THOMAS A. BIGELOW
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Darrell Gaines v. Louis Tomasetti
as 12-6885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL GAINES
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS TOMASETTI, Police Officer at Asheville Police Department, JUSTIN CLINARD, Police Officer at Asheville Police Department, DARRYL FISHER, Police Officer at Asheville Police Department and others
BIGELOW v. TAPROCK ENTERPRISES, et al
as 1:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
KERRY WILSON BIGELOW
Defendant:
TAPROCK ENTERPRISES and ADAM HAUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galligan v. Bigelow et al
as 1:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
James M. Galligan
Defendant:
Jamie E. Bigelow and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
