Cases 21 - 28 of 28
COOK v. KELLER, ET AL.,
as 1:2010cv00299
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL D. COOK
Defendant:
ALVIN KELLER, PAULA SMITH, LEWIS SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Allewein et al
as 0:2010cv00749
Plaintiff:
Curtis Q Owens
Defendant:
NFN Allewein, NFN D Cooke, Luanne Mungo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robin Cook v. Jones & Jordan Engineering, In
as 09-2283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN D. COOK and KEVIN COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
JONES & JORDAN ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, JAMES A. JONES, Individually and KEVIN W. JORDAN, Individually
Defendant - None:
THOMAS W. HANNIGAN, Individually
Third Party Defendant - None:
MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD, INCORPORATED
Robin Cook v. Jones & Jordan Engineering, In
as 09-2246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBIN D. COOK and KEVIN COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
JONES & JORDAN ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, JAMES A. JONES, Individually and KEVIN W. JORDAN, Individually
Defendant - None:
THOMAS W. HANNIGAN, Individually
Third Party Defendant - None:
MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD, INCORPORATED
Cook v. Keller et al
as 5:2009ct03159
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Cook
Defendant:
Alvin Keller, Paula Smith, Lewis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 5:2008hc02090
Petitioner:
Philip D. Cook
Respondent:
U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cook v. Atlas Pacific Engineering Company, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
William D. Cook and William D. Cook
Defendant:
Atlas Pacific Engineering Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2007hc02044
Petitioner:
Philip D. Cook
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
