Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01364
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Dorian Jamerson
as 16-275
Movant: In re: DORIAN JAMERSON
:
Huggins et al v. Taft et al
as 5:2015cv00141
Plaintiff: Kyle Huggins and Dorian Banks
Defendant: Vance Mark Taft, II, Luci Brantley and Wheeling Island Gaming, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv01278
Plaintiff: Dorian Marshall and Tiffany Norris
Defendant: Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TYLER V. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff: DORIAN TYLER
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Young v. Peumansend Creek Regional Jail
as 1:2015cv00264
Defendant: Peumansend Creek Regional Jail
Plaintiff: Dorian D. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kraska et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23500
Plaintiff: Lauren Kraska and Dorian Kraska
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20902
Plaintiff: Dorian V. Taylor and Bennett F. Taylor
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Jeff Howell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4243
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JEFF DORIAN HOWELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00214
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?